The industrial Cognition Tree
The cognition necessary for the implementation of each enterprise as a systemic subject may be depicted schematically and emblematically in the shape of a tree.
Similar to any tree, The Industrial Cognition Tree — in its capacity of schematic and emblematic representation of the enterprise as a systemically implemented subject — has five composite elements (1) fruits, (2) leaves, (3) branches, (4) trunk, and (5) roots.
А symbolic representation of the existential cognition of the enterprise, in its capacity of a systemic subject, about its past, and more importantly, about the future development of its economic result in the form of profit or loss. The condition and growth of the fruits of this tree depend entirely on the condition and growth of its leaves, branches, trunk and roots.
А symbolic representation of the implementational cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This includes the current cognition of the appointed workers related to the specific activity of the enterprise, here and now, concerning the implementation of the systemically necessary space-time trajectories of the multitude of objects (under the logic of the industrial cross), which jointly form the current capital assets of the enterprise: both its own, as well as the ones attracted from the outside. The implementational cognition, referred to a specific object, part of the capital assets of the enterprise, can be most accurately defined by the concept of Implementational MOTELs (an abbreviation referring to the implementational time interval models of the multiple responsibilities over the trajectory of an element).
The responsibilities above should be taken on by the operational technological fields of the enterprise, and more specifically by the appointed workers in charge of their functioning since they are an indispensable part thereof.
The condition and growth of the leaves of The Industrial Cognition Tree, seen as implementational cognitions about attaining an economic result by the enterprise, are directly dependent on the condition and growth of the branches.
А symbolic representation of the principle cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This includes the current cognition of the appointed workers related to the specific activity concerning the establishment of the principle basis of implementational cognition. The principle cognition, referred to a specific object, part of the capital assets of the enterprise, can be most accurately defined by the concept of Principle MOTELs (an abbreviation referring to the principle time interval models of the multiple responsibilities over the trajectory of an element).
The principle cognition is the basis for creation of implementational cognition but unlike implementational cognition, where managerial responsibilities are assigned along the real time axis, the principle cognition assigns responsibilities according to a principle time axis, i.e. by principle time steps and intervals. Consequently, on the basis of one principle cognition, infinite number of implementational cognitions can be generated.
The condition and growth of the branches of The Industrial Cognition Tree, symbolizing principle cognitions that forms the basis for creating implementational cognitions, are directly dependent on the condition and growth of the tree trunk.
А symbolic representation of the functional cognition at the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This is the knowledge that indicate the essence of the ways for creating principle cognition and its respective outcomes, as well as the ways for creating implementational cognitions by the application of principle cognitions with the purpose of attaining industrial results.
The nature of the functional cognitions of the enterprise can be understood by comprehending the objective meaning of two abbreviations, interrelated in their denotations: (a) SIS (Subjecthood Implementation System) of the enterprise, and (b) VCSS (Volitional and Conceptual Space of Subjecthood) of the enterprise.
SIS (Subjecthood Implementation System) of the enterprise defines in a logical and meaningful way all that should be performed by the human capital of the enterprise so that it (the enterprise) could justify the meaning of its intended purpose. In this role, the SIS of the enterprise appears as a form of a DNA program for implementing the technological environment of the enterprise, and more specifically, the work behaviour of its human capital, seen in its entirety and as an integral part of this environment. In other words, “RSE” is a concept depicting the logically needed knowledge for the objective definition of the personal work responsibilities of all employees, who form the enterprise human capital.
At first glance, every enterprise has a unique SIS when compared to the SIS of other enterprises, but after a more serious examination and analysis on the principle setup and way of functioning of the modern enterprise, it could be seen that the different “RSE” more resemble each other than differ from each other. The reason behind this similarity is rooted in the identicality of their VCSS. The VCCS is an abbreviation for the volitional and conceptual space of subjecthood of the enterprise.
By its nature, VCCS is universal and represents the building spiritual core of every SIS. Further, this core is upbuilt by a set of enterprise-specific cognitions (concerning specific technological processes, specific operations, etc.)
A symbolic representation of the foundation cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. Examples for foundation cognitions of the enterprise can be found in the applied knowledge of the natural sciences in fields such as Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Engineering, etc. The knowledge for a universal systemic model of the enterprise symbolically represented by The Industrial Cross and The Industrial Cognition Tree, are also examples of foundation cognitions.
The industrial Cognition Tree
The cognition necessary for the implementation of each enterprise as a systemic subject may be depicted schematically and emblematically in the shape of a tree.
Similar to any tree, The Industrial Cognition Tree — in its capacity of schematic and emblematic representation of the enterprise as a systemically implemented subject — has five composite elements (1) fruits, (2) leaves, (3) branches, (4) trunk, and (5) roots.
А symbolic representation of the existential cognition of the enterprise, in its capacity of a systemic subject, about its past, and more importantly, about the future development of its economic result in the form of profit or loss. The condition and growth of the fruits of this tree depend entirely on the condition and growth of its leaves, branches, trunk and roots.
А symbolic representation of the implementational cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This includes the current cognition of the appointed workers related to the specific activity of the enterprise, here and now, concerning the implementation of the systemically necessary space-time trajectories of the multitude of objects (under the logic of the industrial cross), which jointly form the current capital assets of the enterprise: both its own, as well as the ones attracted from the outside. The implementational cognition, referred to a specific object, part of the capital assets of the enterprise, can be most accurately defined by the concept of Implementational MOTELs (an abbreviation referring to the implementational time interval models of the multiple responsibilities over the trajectory of an element).
The responsibilities above should be taken on by the operational technological fields of the enterprise, and more specifically by the appointed workers in charge of their functioning since they are an indispensable part thereof.
The condition and growth of the leaves of The Industrial Cognition Tree, seen as implementational cognitions about attaining an economic result by the enterprise, are directly dependent on the condition and growth of the branches.
А symbolic representation of the principle cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This includes the current cognition of the appointed workers related to the specific activity concerning the establishment of the principle basis of implementational cognition. The principle cognition, referred to a specific object, part of the capital assets of the enterprise, can be most accurately defined by the concept of Principle MOTELs (an abbreviation referring to the principle time interval models of the multiple responsibilities over the trajectory of an element).
The principle cognition is the basis for creation of implementational cognition but unlike implementational cognition, where managerial responsibilities are assigned along the real time axis, the principle cognition assigns responsibilities according to a principle time axis, i.e. by principle time steps and intervals. Consequently, on the basis of one principle cognition, infinite number of implementational cognitions can be generated.
The condition and growth of the branches of The Industrial Cognition Tree, symbolizing principle cognitions that forms the basis for creating implementational cognitions, are directly dependent on the condition and growth of the tree trunk.
А symbolic representation of the functional cognition at the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. This is the knowledge that indicate the essence of the ways for creating principle cognition and its respective outcomes, as well as the ways for creating implementational cognitions by the application of principle cognitions with the purpose of attaining industrial results.
The nature of the functional cognitions of the enterprise can be understood by comprehending the objective meaning of two abbreviations, interrelated in their denotations: (a) SIS (Subjecthood Implementation System) of the enterprise, and (b) VCSS (Volitional and Conceptual Space of Subjecthood) of the enterprise.
SIS (Subjecthood Implementation System) of the enterprise defines in a logical and meaningful way all that should be performed by the human capital of the enterprise so that it (the enterprise) could justify the meaning of its intended purpose. In this role, the SIS of the enterprise appears as a form of a DNA program for implementing the technological environment of the enterprise, and more specifically, the work behaviour of its human capital, seen in its entirety and as an integral part of this environment. In other words, “RSE” is a concept depicting the logically needed knowledge for the objective definition of the personal work responsibilities of all employees, who form the enterprise human capital.
At first glance, every enterprise has a unique SIS when compared to the SIS of other enterprises, but after a more serious examination and analysis on the principle setup and way of functioning of the modern enterprise, it could be seen that the different “RSE” more resemble each other than differ from each other. The reason behind this similarity is rooted in the identicality of their VCSS. The VCCS is an abbreviation for the volitional and conceptual space of subjecthood of the enterprise.
By its nature, VCCS is universal and represents the building spiritual core of every SIS. Further, this core is upbuilt by a set of enterprise-specific cognitions (concerning specific technological processes, specific operations, etc.)
A symbolic representation of the foundation cognition of the enterprise in its capacity as a systemic subject. Examples for foundation cognitions of the enterprise can be found in the applied knowledge of the natural sciences in fields such as Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Engineering, etc. The knowledge for a universal systemic model of the enterprise symbolically represented by The Industrial Cross and The Industrial Cognition Tree, are also examples of foundation cognitions.